Rankia México Rankia Argentina Rankia Brasil Rankia Chile Rankia Colombia Rankia Czechia Rankia Deutschland Rankia España Rankia France Rankia Indonesia Rankia Italia Rankia Magyarország Rankia Netherlands Rankia Perú Rankia Polska Rankia Portugal Rankia Romania Rankia Türkiye Rankia United Kingdom Rankia USA
Acceder

Farmas USA

135K respuestas
Farmas USA
85 suscriptores
Farmas USA
Página
11,763 / 16,979
#94097

Re: Farmas USA

Ánimo y siento el resultado 😉....en mi caso , hasta que no vea cierre de hoy , ni tocar....en cualquier momento se puede girar hacia arriba o hacia abajo...NVAX

Pd. Me coge embarcando y en el avión me pierdo lo importante....sino ,es una de esas tardes para sacarle mucho jugo...

#94098

Re: Farmas USA

TGTX

Ya han liberado PR sobre lo que presentaban en londres. Yo he puesto orden de venta a 7,50 como dije ayer(también por tema opciones).

TG Therapeutics, Inc. Announces Presentation of Data from a Phase Ib Clinical Trial of TG-1101 in Patients with Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) at the 32nd Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis

http://ir.tgtherapeutics.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=989405

A single 450 mg infusion of TG-1101 (ublituximab) rapidly and effectively depleted B-cells during acute NMO relapses without significant risks in this patient population

TG-1101 was well tolerated, with minimal adverse events and no SAEs or infections observed

Timed 25-foot walk and visual acuity, NMO-specific functional measures of recovery, improved along with EDSS scores in patients treated with TG-1101 in combination with corticosteroids

#94099

Re: Farmas USA

esas comisiones son una barbaridad, del estilo de las de renta 4...

#94100

Re: Farmas USA

berbere son las comisiones de IB. En Degiro ni se me ocurre entrar,Bankinter las comisiones son mucho mejor pero no tiene esas 60 tipos de ordenes que tiene IB, Cualquier sugerencia me viene MB

#94101

Re: Farmas USA

post de BBALLGM, ya sabeis que respeto a este forero de Yahoo

What can I say...nothing is guaranteed in Phase III. And I lost a big part of my net worth on today's results, although a lot that net worth was made by Novavax. It sucks.

Anyways, we can either cry about it or analyze if this is salvageable. Well let's see.

There is definitely cause for concern. The re-dose phase II results are very strange....the Placebo-Vaccine group data is counter-intuitive because it is higher than the Vaccine-Vaccine group, yet it has worse efficacy data even with the highest titer.

Let's then look at the Phase III data. The vaccine group looks exactly like the placebo group, and that is not good. So the first question that comes to mind is why is it so different than the Phase II data. Why is the attack rate in Phase III less than HALF of what was seen in Phase II? I've been thinking about this for awhile, and it is a good thing they ran the re-dose trial because that also showed very low attack rate. So if we compared the placebo groups between the Phase III and Phase II redose trial, they match very closely...so this would indicate that indeed the attack rate is much lower for Phase III, just a chance of bad luck perhaps.

I would really want to the Kaplan Meir curve for this Phase III trial to see if it was really a low attack rate this season, or that Novavax started enrolling for the Phase III trial too late in the season. The original Phase II trial started in October 2014. The Phase III and Phase II redose trial both started in November 2015. So does 1-1.5 month difference in trial start make that big of a difference? It could be the reason for the lower attack rate. I want to see if the Kaplan Meir curve, and if there is a big drop at the beginning of the curve which may indicate the trial was started a bit late, and the RSV season has already started. Typically, RSV season onset starts in late October. Every season is a bit different, some start later and last longer.

What I mean by cocooning is that Novavax may have enrolled too many people within a short period of time within the same community. This may be a stretch, but something to look into.

If we look at the Phase III breakdown of enrolled patients...basically 100% of the enrolled are in community living...which is typical of elderly since they need assistance and probably living in group homes. And they probably tell each other about making some cash with being in the trial, so if I was Novavax, I would look at how close are the patients living with each other. The thought is that if they are all from the same neighborhood, and if the RSV vaccine is working, then the overall RSV incidence will be lower than usual. Since this is a virus, it needs hosts to spread the RSV, so 1 person infects 2 people, and those 2 people infect 4....so on and so on. Now if you start introducing a vaccine into a group of people who are in the same neighborhood, then you effectively lower the incidence rate because you stop the spread from the beginning. 60 sites for 12,000 people...so roughly 200 elderly per site. That's not too much considering how many elderly are there, but they need to look at if there are clusters of the enrolled living in the same community. Especially if they were being recruited heavily or if they go to the same elderly center. I've seen where they go to the elderly center, and just advertise to make some money, and the elderly is bused to the clinic in groups. Easy and quick recruitment. Just something to look into when the break down the site by site, and perhaps interview some patients on how they were recruited or look at the addresses / community centers.

If I was Novavax, I would start another Phase III trial, but I would want to start the enrollment at end of September/start of October, and perhaps spread out even more sites and make sure the recruitment is not from same community area.

Same goes for their Phase II redose trial

NVAX

#94102

Re: Farmas USA

Lo siento por los invertidos.
He borrado 15 veces el post. antes de colgarlo

Aprenderemos de una puta vez? el que se juega los eventos tiene que saber que es una lotería y obviar todos y cada unos de los comentarios, riesgo puro y total, la palabra de-risked no existe en Farmas, no es compatible.

La palabra BO y las especulaciones mejor en la mente de cada uno que después nos confundimos.

Grabar a fuego, Loteria, Loteria, Loteria.

En todas las farmas siempre tienes cosas positivas y negativas antes de resultados y no te metas a analizarlos porque si estás invertido, como estas invirtiendo con la emocion todo lo ves positivo.
Y da igual lo que analices, vas a fallar y te vas a equivocar, lo único que importa son los resultados.
las hay con 90% de institucionales y fallan las hay con un 10% y salen bien, precios objetivos altísimos y fallan, bajisimos y salen bien, no analicéis, Loteria, cortos por un tubo y salen de puta madre o viceversa, no hay análisis que valga, solo valen los resultados.

Hay que aprender de esta. Yo me he estallado ya unas cuantas veces y me seguirá pasando, lo bueno es que ya desde hace tiempo tengo claro que es una lotería.

Alguna vez una buena cagada sirve para que aprendamos, mucha suerte, que estoy seguro que vendrá.

#94103

Re: Farmas USA

Pues si Novavax piensa lo mismo hasta finales de 2017 no empezarán el ensayo en el hemisferio norte aunque lo podrían empezar antes en el hemisferio sur. Los datos esterían disponibles para mediados-finales de 2018. Mucho tiempo sin noticias para mantener las acciones en cartera.
Quizás esa confirmación durante la conferencia del 11 le puede dar un pequeño empujón al día siguiente pero nada más.

NVAX

#94104

Re: Farmas USA

Realmente los ánimos en el blog de Nasdaqlandia están por los suelos... creo que entre todos llevaban un pastizal... no recuerdo la cifra exacta, pero un día la comentó Framus y era de aúpa.

Ana, Superfungui es el autor del blog. Se llama Ramón, y a veces se refieren a él por el nombre. No creo que ande por aquí (si lo hace utiliza un nick totalmente distinto).

NVAX

Brokers destacados